The Wrightslaw Way

to Special Education Law and Advocacy

The Wrightslaw Way random header image

Denying Access to IEPs for Regular Ed Teachers

by Wrightslaw

I am a regular ed teacher. It’s been weeks since I started teaching at a new school, and I have no idea who is on an IEP or 504. I don’t even know who the special ed teacher is. I asked for a list of all the students who have IEPs and 504s. I was told I could not receive a list because of student confidentiality.

Is it really true that regular ed teachers are not allowed to have a list of all the students who have an IEP at the school?

Students with IEPs and 504 plans do not have any right to confidentiality when it comes to their teacher knowing what that teacher is supposed to provide in services and/or accommodations.

Imagine the ramifications if teachers were not allowed to see IEPs and 504 plans because they were “confidential.” And why would the IEP or 504 team create a document that lists the services the school is legally required to provide — if the providers are not allowed to see the document?

According to Appendix A of the Special Education Regulations, “…regular education teachers play a central role in the education of children with disabilities (H. Rep. No. 105-95, p. 103 (1997); S. Rep. No. 105-17, p. 23 (1997)) and have important expertise regarding the general curriculum and the general education environment.”

When IDEA added the emphasis on involvement and progress in the general curriculum, the role of regular education teachers became increasingly critical (together with special education and related services personnel) in implementing the program of FAPE described in the IEP for most children with disabilities.

When IDEA was reauthorized in 2004, the law was amended to ensure that children with disabilities could participate in extracurricular activities and other nonacademic activities. These activities include recreation and recess, special interest groups, clubs, lunch. It would be essential for any teachers who work with children during these times to know what the teacher is supposed to provide in services and/or accommodations.

If I was in your shoes, I think I’d find out who the special ed director is and send your problem to him/her, in writing.

Print Friendly

Tags:   · · · · · · 12 Comments

Leave a Reply

12 Comments on "Denying Access to IEPs for Regular Ed Teachers"


“Students with IEPs and 504 plans do not have any right to confidentiality when it comes to their teacher knowing what that teacher is supposed to provide in services and/or accommodations.” but you’re missing the point they do have rights to confidentiality when the teacher doesn’t work with the student. It also seems like if part of the IEP or 504 do not pertain to the work done with that teacher then they wouldn’t have rights to that information. While most of the time parents will want all teachers to know about the students accommodations, I can think of many situations where it is inappropriate. It seems to me this teacher would only have a right to info about the students and parts of their 504/IEP that pertain to that teacher, the rest would be confidential.


I have been in many UA classes with special ed. students to assist them. The other students on 504s were never identified to the art teacher who did not understand why a student kept chirping but could do the work. Or, the gym teacher who did not know that a student with severe ADHD needed some extra time or breaks. The case manager should be working with the staff–a list is not the case. Most school have team leaders and meet weekly to review student progress–this is where information is shared. It takes about 2 weeks. But, in some schools–especially middle and high school–i
I have seen IEPS stuffed in the back of desk. It is truly up to the parent to advocate to EACH teacher. Some systems are better than others.


OK, I am with Sharon. what is being asked is can a list of students who have IEP’s be made and given to every teacher at the school? Including teachers that do not serve those students? It has been my experience that such lists get left laying around and teens are smart and can determine that if someone is on the list then the are disabled. To me this is a breech of confidentiality. If I were a parent, I would be mad. Real world people!
So, blanket list to all the gen ed teachers or wait a week for schedule changes and give them copy of the mods?


A Colleague of mine sent me to this web page.

Thank you so much for this clarification! This has been an on-going struggle for a friend of mine. I also teach at a university and I can’t tell you how many times a teacher (usually at the high school level) has told me she can’t “see” the IEP because of “confidentiality.” It really makes no sense AT ALL. I suspect those who want to hold the key to all the important information are really “all about” control (rather than leaving no child behind) and working as a team to “make school work” for ALL children.

Another good resource (for people who need this in black and white) is located at

Thanks again, Wright’s Law!



My son’s IEP states that work is to be modified. It has been discovered by his class teach. that he can NOT fill in the bubbles on the pratice tests do to fine motor disability because of Autism. They are going to take part of benchmark test next month and she is concerned. Does it not stand that since Work is to be modified that Test wouldn’t be also? It seems like common sense but the LEA states NO. He takes as is. Should I call a Meeting and have this addressed in his IEP formally? This seems to me to be a educational impact even though he meets everything academically.