|
|
The Special Ed Advocate newsletter
It's Unique ... and Free! |
|
|
|
2026
Training Programs |
March 12, 2026 - Long Island, NY
March 26, 2026 - San Antonio, TX
May 9, 2026 - WV via ZOOM
July 7, 2026 - Buffalo, NY
Sept. 17, 2026 MD via ZOOM
Full Schedule
|
|
Wrightslaw |
|
Home
About Pete
About Pam
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap |
|
Books & Training |
|
Wrightslaw Store
Advocate's Store
Student Bookstore
Exam Copies
Training Center
Mail & Fax Orders |
Advocacy Library |
Articles
Cool Tools
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Short Course Series
Success Stories
Tips
|
Law Library |
Articles
Caselaw
Fed Court Complaints
IDEA 2004
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
|
Topics |
Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
American Indian
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
Episodic, such as
Allergies, Asthma,
Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc
ESSA
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE / Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints / Seclusion and Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education |
Resources & Directories |
Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources Directories
Disability Groups
International
State DOEs
State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
Legal Terms
Assessment Terms
Best School Websites |
| |
|
Back
to School on Civil Rights
VIII. Summary
and Conclusions
This report assessed the monitoring, compliance,
and enforcement activities of the Federal Government related to the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). In the Department
of Education (DoED), it considered the grant eligibility process, the
state monitoring process up to the fall of 1998, and the federal complaint
processes. Enforcement efforts were examined, as well as the role of
the Department of Justice (DOJ). These activities were examined in terms
of the outcomes they have produced and the compliance/enforcement authorities
available under the law. Litigation challenging state monitoring systems
was reviewed, as were the features of new state monitoring systems currently
being developed as a result of litigation. Technical assistan ce/public
information initiatives targeted to parents and families of children
served by IDEA were highlighted. Views from IDEA stakeholders, including
parents, advocates, and a state special education director, were offered.
The findings indicate that failure to ensure
compliance with IDEA is widespread and persists over time. While noncompliance
is regularly documented by the Department of Education, sanctions have
rarely been used. Some authorities available for enforcement have not
been utilized; others have been under-utilized. The very extensive state
monitoring process used by DoED appeared to serve multiple purposes
and be related more to program improvement than enforcing full compliance
with the law. There was a lack of balance between these objectives,
with continuing emphasis on program improvement, even in instances of
persistent noncompliance. Parents expressed frustration and disappointment
at the slow progress in the implementation of IDEA.
The recommendations in this report are
intended to strengthen federal authority for enforcement, as well as
federal systems for monitoring and ensuring compliance. They are intended
to build upon what has been learned in 25 years of monitoring compliance
and enforcement activity under IDEA, as well as what has been learned
about effective enforcement mechanisms in our nation's other civil rights
laws. Activities generated by the 1997 amendments to IDEA make this
a unique opportunity to redesign some features of the monitoring/enforcement
scheme to ensure that the new law produces the intended results for
students with disabilities and their families.
To Consolidated
List of Findings and Recommendations
To Endnotes
To Index,
IDEA Compliance Report
|
|