Wrights
law


The Special Ed Advocate Newsletter
November 5, 1998

 Home  >  Advocacy Libraries  >  Newsletter Archives  >  1998  >  November 5, 1998

Home  
Issue - 16

ISSN: 1538-3202


The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2014 - 2015 Training Programs


Aug 21 - Norfolk, VA

Oct 23 - Wilton, CT

Oct 25 - Olympia, WA

Oct 30 - Phoenix, AZ

Nov 6 - McAllen, TX

Nov 21 - Temecula, CA

Dec 4 - OKC, OK

Full Schedule

Be a Hero ...

 Jason at Ft. Benning
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
New! Military Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Summer School Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
Fed Court Complaints

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 
The Special Ed Advocate is a free online newsletter about special education legal issues, cases, tactics and strategy, educational methods that work, and Internet links.

We publish this newsletter occasionally, when time permits. Back issues of The Special Ed Advocate are archived at our web site -

http://www.wrightslaw.com

As a subscriber to The Special Ed Advocate, you will receive announcements and "alerts" about new cases and other events. Contact, copyright, and subscription information can be found at the end of this newsletter.


(1) NEWS FLASH! U. S. Supreme Court hears Oral Argument in Cedar Rapids v. Garret F. (November 5, 1998).

(2) Additions to the Advocate’s Bookstore



(1) NEWS FLASH! U. S. Supreme Court hears Oral Argument in Cedar Rapids v. Garret F. (November 5, 1998).

When Garret was four, he was severely injured in a motorcycle accident. His mental abilities were unaffected. His spinal cord injury left him paralyzed from the neck down. He depends on a ventilator to breathe.

When he attends school, Garret needs occasional nursing services – help eating and drinking, positioning of his wheelchair, and catheterization. Garret needs some of these services once or twice a day. For most of the day, "all he needs is someone within earshot," says Douglas Oelschaeger, Garret’s attorney,

On Wednesday, November 5, the Supreme Court debated how much nursing care schools must provide to children with disabilities. Susan L. Seitz, attorney for Cedar Rapids School District, argued that the district should not have to provide (pay) for the child’s care.

"A nurse just for you? Certainly there can be a line drawn there to say that’s medical" – and the school shouldn’t have to provide (pay) for it, she claimed.

Some of the Justices expressed frustration with the school district lawyer’s assertion that the school should not have to pay for Garret’s care, even if the school does provide some of his health care functions.

"That is a very hard line to draw," said Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. "I don’t think that’s going to work. Do you have a fallback position?"

Later, Justice Antonin Scalia told Seitz, "I hate multi-factor tests. Can you give us any other clearer line?"

Garret’s mother asked the school to pay the cost of providing an attendant for him. She believes that the district must provide this for Garret under the Individuals with Disabilities Act. The IDEA provides that all children with disabilities are to receive a "free appropriate public education" (FAPE). School districts are required to provide
"special education and related services."

The federal trial judge and the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled for Garret and against the school district. The appeals court decided that because the care Garret receives is not provided by a doctor, it is not exempt as a medical service.

We will advise subscribers to the Special Ed Advocate when the Supreme Court issues their decision in Garret’s case.

In the meantime, you can read the Eighth Circuit decision in our Law Library.
 

http://www.wrightslaw.com/case_cedar_rapids.html

This decision is also reported in Volume 25 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Law Reporter at page 439, cited as 25 IDELR 439, and at 106 F. 3d 822 (8th Cir. 1997).

The decision is also available at the FindLaw web site:

http://laws.findlaw.com/8th/961987P.html


(2) ADDITIONS TO THE ADVOCATE'S BOOKSTORE

Interested in mediation? Want to find a good guide that will help you with legal research? Looking for help to make your way through the "Special Ed Maze?"

Within the last few days, we have added several books to the Law Section of the Advocate’s Bookstore. Check them out – and let us know your suggestions.

http://www.wrightslaw.com/bkstore/bks_law.htm

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

 

Copyright © 1998-2014, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map