Wrights
law


The Special Ed Advocate Newsletter
September 19, 2000

 Home  >  Advocacy Libraries  >  Newsletter Archives  >  2000  >  September 19

Home  
Issue - 87

ISSN: 1538-3202


The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2014 - 2015 Training Programs

Oct 23 - Wilton, CT

Oct 25 - Olympia, WA

Oct 30 - Phoenix, AZ

Nov 6 - McAllen, TX

Nov 18 - DesMoines, IA

Nov 21 - Temecula, CA

Dec 4 - OKC, OK

Full Schedule

Be a Hero ...

 Jason at Ft. Benning
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
New! Military Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Summer School Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
Fed Court Complaints

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
ISEA
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 

1. New Decision from Ninth Circuit: Attorney Fees for IEP Meetings

On September 5, 2000, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit awarded attorney fees for IEP meetings to the parents of a child with autism.

In LUCHT v. MOLALLA RIVER, the parents filed a complaint with the Oregon department of education about violations of their son's rights under the IDEA. After an investigation, the state department of education found that the child's rights had been violated and ordered the school district to convene an IEP meeting and develop a new IEP for the child. Several IEP meetings were held. During some of these IEP meetings, the parents were represented by an attorney.

After these issues were resolved, the parents brought suit in federal district court, seeking to recover attorney fees incurred for the IEP meetings attended by their lawyer. The school district claimed that the IDEA prohibits payment of legal fees for IEP meetings.

In LUCHT, the Court described two ways to resolve disputes about a child's special education. Under the IDEA statute, parents can request an impartial due process hearing. Parents may also file a complaint with their state department of education (SEA). In some cases, parents may request an impartial due process hearing AND file a complaint with the state department of education.

Pursuant to federal IDEA regulations about complaint resolution, state departments of education (SEAs) are required to " . . . carry out an independent on-site investigation, give the complainant an opportunity to supply additional information about the allegations, determine whether the school district is violating the IDEA and, within 60 days of the filing of the complaint, issue a written decision containing factual findings, conclusions, and the reasons for the final decision. See 34 C.F.R. § 300.661." The SEA decision must include ways for the district to implement their decision, including "technical assistance," negotiations, and "corrective actions to achieve compliance."

You can download this new decision from the Law Library.

NOTE: The Ninth Circuit includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and Guam.

Do you know your Circuit? Use the Wrightslaw Circuit Finder.


2. "Closing the Gap:" The National Council on Disability Needs Your Help!

On January 25, 2000, the National Council on Disability published the IDEA Compliance Report, "Back to School on Civil Rights," and found that:

* All 50 states were out of compliance with the IDEA. 
* The U. S. Department of Education does not enforce the IDEA. 
* Enforcing the law falls on the shoulders of parents. 

To enforce the law, parents must often request expensive, time-consuming due process hearings and engage in battles with school board attorneys whose fees are paid with tax dollars. The IDEA Compliance Report described the human costs of this policy:

"These findings prove very clearly that children with disabilities continue to be denied their civil rights under the federal law, IDEA. Not only have parents of children with disabilities lost the education for their children, but in many cases, due to undue stress and the time and money invested in legal battles, they have also lost their homes, jobs, and often the family structure." (link to Report below)

Now, the National Council on Disability needs YOUR help. 

NCD has drafted a "strategic action plan" called "Closing the Gap: A Ten Point Strategy for the Next Decade of Disability Civil Rights Enforcement." They asked us to provide our subscribers with their Plan and want your feedback. You can download a copy of "Closing the Gap: A Ten Point Strategy for the Next Ten Years of Disability Civil Rights Enforcement" in pdf or html format.

In pdf

In html

Please download this document and review it. Send your feedback to Kathleen Blank at NCD, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20004. Fax: 202-272-2022. Email: kblank@ncd.gov
Deadline: September 30, 2000. 

If you need a reason or two to do this, download and review the IDEA Compliance Report from the Wrightslaw site (be sure to use our "search tips" to get compliance information about your state).

Get mad - then get energized. Think about the children. Isn't it time we make the world a better place for all children? The status quo won't change unless you get involved. As the folks from NCD say, "The law is a tool, but people are the power behind change."


3. News: Pete & Pam Wright to Speak in Long Island (October 13 & 14, 2000)

On Friday, October 13 and Saturday, October 14, 2000, Pete and Pam Wright will speak at conferences sponsored by The Long Island Advocacy Center, Inc and the Nassau Coordinating Council of Special Education PTAs. Friday's session will be from a legal educational perspective. Saturday's session will focus on the needs of the parent advocate. Topics include:

* LRE/Access to general curriculum;
* how to avoid due process hearings while securing quality services;
* use of State Education Complaint Procedures;
* private sector evaluations and consultants, their use and input in the IEP process;
* case law affecting children in New York;
* legal requirements about staff and teacher training;
* eligibility, prior written notice, IEP's, procedural safeguards, private school placements.

Information about both conferences.

Conference information is also available at the Coordinating Council's site


4. News Flash: Lawsuits Filed Against Maker of Ritalin, APA, CHADD

On September 14, The Wall Street Journal published an article, "Maker of Ritalin, Psychiatric Group Sued," about lawsuits filed last week in California and New Jersey. "The lawyers who brought you suits over tobacco, guns and health maintenance organizations have a new target: Ritalin."

"Yesterday, plaintiffs lawyers filed two suits, alleging that the maker of Ritalin, the commonly prescribed attention-deficit treatment, conspired with a psychiatric group to "create" a disease, and later hyped the drug's benefits. The cases, filed in California and New Jersey, seek billions of dollars in damages, and are likely to be followed by suits on behalf of consumers in other states, the lawyers said."

A similar suit was filed in Texas a few months ago. 

According to the WSJ, the lawsuits contend that the pharmaceutical manufacturers and the American Psychiatric Association "conspired to create a broad-based definition of hyperactivity disorders in the standard medical text used by doctors" which "had the effect of boosting sales and profits" and that the companies "employed false and misleading advertising, which played down the drugs side effects, and oversold the benefits."

You may get a copy of this article by searching the Wall Street Journal siteNote: This article will only be available for  a week from the Wall Street Journal site.

Stay tuned. We'll keep subscribers posted about new developments in these important cases.

Home

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

 

Copyright 1998-2014, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map