The Special Ed Advocate newsletter
It's Unique ... and Free!
Sep 24 - Nashua, NH
Oct 1 - San Antonio, TX
Oct 11 - Denver, CO
Oct 22-23 - Torrance, CA
Oct 26 - Park City, UT
Nov 4 - Atlanta, GA
Nov 12 - Glen Burnie, MD
Be a Hero ...
... to a Hero
Topics from A-Z
Seminars & Training
Yellow Pages for Kids
Books & Training
Mail & Fax Orders
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
Short Course Series
Fed Court Complaints
Behavior & Discipline
Episodic, such as
Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc
Identification & Child Find
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE / Inclusion
Military / DOD
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Response to Intervention
Restraints / Seclusion
School Report Cards
Teachers & Principals
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education
Resources & Directories
Legal & Advocacy
Best School Websites
to "NCLB Weapons of Public Education
Destruction" by Sue Whitney
Congress has reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA), the statute formerly known as No Child Left
Behind. The new statute, Every Student Succeeds Act, was signed into law by President Obama on December 10, 2015.
On May 29, 2003, EducationNews featured an Op/Ed article entitled "NCLB
Weapons of Public Education Destruction. This article included
inaccuracies about retention, high-stakes testing, and the No Child
Left Behind Act.
Research editor Sue Whitney wrote a letter to set the record straight.
letter was published in EducationNews on May 30 and is reproduced
Mr. Pryzbyla spoke against the use of retention and high stakes testing
in his May 29 article, "NCLB Weapons of Public Education Destruction."
I agree that these practices are not educationally sound. I disagree
that they are required by the No Child Left Behind Act.
would like to set the record straight.
tests required by the No Child Left Behind Act are designed to test
the success of schools, not to test or punish individual students.
The sanctions mandated in No Child Left Behind are directed at schools
that fail to teach students. No Child Left Behind does not include
any sanctions for students or groups of students.
fact, the law includes this following statement:
Nothing in this part shall be construed to prescribe the use of the
academic assessments described in this part for student promotion
or graduation purposes." Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, 20 U.S.C.
Section 6311 (l)
states are choosing to use retention and exit exams to hold children back.
These decisions are choices made by the states. These are poor choices,
but they are not required or recommended by the No Child Left Behind Act.
Sue Whitney Heath
Research Editor, Wrightslaw.com
Email: sueheath | at | wrightslaw.com
Meet Sue Whitney
Sue Whitney of Manchester, New
Hampshire, is the research editor for Wrightslaw.
Sue Whitney Heath, as she was formerly known, was the co-author of our now, out of print, book, Wrightslaw: No Child Left Behind (ISBN: 978-1-892320-12-4) which was published by Harbor House Law Press.
In Doing Your Homework, she
writes about reading, research based instruction, No Child Left Behind, and
strategies for using federal education standards to advocate for
and to improve public schools. Her articles have been reprinted by SchwabLearning.org, EducationNews.org, Bridges4Kids.org, The Beacon: Journal of Special Education Law and Practice, the Schafer Autism Report, and have been used in CLE presentations to attorneys. Sue Whitney's bio.
Sue has served on New Hampshire's Special Education State
Committee on the Education of Students/Children with Disabilities
has been a volunteer educational surrogate parent. She currently works with families as a special education advocate.
© 2002-2020 by Suzanne Whitney.