COVID-19   Law    Advocacy    Topics A-Z     Training    Wrights' Blog   Wrightslaw Store    Yellow Pages for Kids 

 HomeX >  Privacy, Confidentiality, Education Records> Federal Court Rules That Parents Entitled to Test Protocols (see Newport-Mesa case; NASP Newsletter)

The Special Ed Advocate newsletter
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

Training Programs

Mar. 20-21 CA - Private

Apr. 11 - Denver, CO

June 5-8 - San Antonio, TX

Sept. 24 - MD via ZOOM

Full Schedule


Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Cool Tools
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
Newsletter Archives
Short Course Series
Success Stories

Law Library

Fed Court Complaints
IDEA 2004
McKinney-Vento Homeless
Section 504


American Indian
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
College/Continuing Ed
Due Process
Early Intervention
  (Part C)

Episodic, such as
   Allergies, Asthma,
   Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc

Future Planning
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE / Inclusion
Military / DOD
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Related Services
Research Based

Response to Intervention

Restraints / Seclusion
   and Abuse

School Report Cards
Section 504
Teachers & Principals
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
  Disability Groups
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites


Federal Court Rules That Parents Are Entitled to Test Protocols

Test publishers and school districts may not assert copyright protections

To view Pete Wright's YouTube video about "Parent's Right of Access to Test Protocols," please click the YouTube link below.

On May 24, 2005 the U.S. District Court, Central District of California issued a decision in Newport-Mesa v. California Dept. of Ed.  and held that a California statute requiring copies of test protocols to be provided to parents of special education students falls within acceptable "fair use" under federal copyright law. The Court invited the publishers of the Weschler IQ test and of the Woodcock-Johnson tests, who had the right to complain about copyright violations if necessary, to intervene in this case.

The Court held that the parents were entitled to a copy of their child's test protocols.

Download decision in Newport-Mesa v. California Dept of Ed, 371 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2005)




(Verbatim quotes below are copied from the 14 page decision.)

"California Education Code section 56504 provides parents of special education students may have copies of their child's test protocols. Defendant Jack Anthony's son is a seven-year-old with special education needs who lives in Plaintiff Newport-Mesa Unified School District. Mr. Anthony requested copies of his son's test protocols before a scheduled Individualized Education Program ("IEP") meeting. The District declined to provide him with the copyrighted test protocol for the Woodcock-Johnson Test of Achievement III.

"Mr. Anthony filed a complaint with Defendant California Department of Education, which found the District out of compliance with California Education Code section 56504 by failing to provide Mr. Anthony with records within five days of his request. The Department ordered the District to revise its policies and procedures on student record requests to comply with section 56504 and to send it a copy of the new written policy within sixty days. The Department denied a request for reconsideration of this compliance report. Plaintiff brought the matter to this Court, contending United States copyright law prevents it from providing copies of copyrighted test protocols.

"The District requested a declaration of its rights under copyright law and an injunction to prevent the Department from enforcing its compliance report. At the Court's invitation, Harcourt Assessment, Inc., the publisher and copyright owner of the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-III, and Riverside Publishing Co., the publisher and copyright owner of the Woodcock-Johnson III, intervened in the case to assert the copyright interest."

". . . The Court concludes a school giving parents of special education students copies of their children's test protocols when requested under California Education Code section 56504 is a fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. In order to minimize the risk of improper use, the District may choose to use appropriate safeguards, such as requiring a review by parents of the original test protocols before obtaining a copy, a written request for a copy, a nondisclosure or confidentiality agreement, or other reasonable measures."


From NASP - Copying Protocols to Parents: Clarification of FERPA Requirements

NASP Communiqué, Vol. 31, #1
September 2002
By Andrea Canter, NCSP

From National Association of School Psychologists (NASP)

NASP Communique, Vol. 31, #1, September 2002

Since the publication of "Test Protocols" (Canter, Communiqué , May 2001), NASP staff and Ethics Committee members have continued to review available laws and regulations, as well as reported experiences and district policies, regarding the review and release of copies of test protocols.

Recently a New York City NASP member provided material from Wrightslaw (Wright & Wright, 1999) citing complete text of the Family Education Records and Privacy Act (FERPA), highlighting a section regarding the release of copies of test protocols.

As previously reported, FERPA, IDEA and Section 504 all require that parents be given access to school records (including test protocols), and that this access is limited to a review of records unless the records cannot be provided for review within 45 days.

When such a delay occurs, then parents are to receive copies of the records.

Further, parents may request that actual copies of records be released to appropriate third parties (such as community mental health providers).

FERPA includes an additional provision neglected in our earlier analysis: Once the parent has formally requested release of school records to a third party, the parent is then entitled to copies of the same records.

In other words, once schools have released copies of protocols to a third party at the parents' request, the parent may request and receive copies as well.

From National Association of School Psychologists (NASP)
NASP Communique, Vol. 31, #1, September 2002

Wright, P.W.D. & Wright, P.D. (1999). Wrightslaw: Special Education Law. Hartfield, VA: Harbor House Law Press.

Thanks to the New York City NASP member for passing along this information. School psychologists are cautioned that the above information is not intended to substitute for legal advice and district legal counsel should be consulted regarding interpretation of federal and state regulations.

The text of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is in Chapter 9 of Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Ed.

Last revised: 7/7/16

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!