![]() |
|
|
Home > Ask the Advocate > Present Levels: The Foundation of the IEP by Pat Howey |
|
|
Relationship Between Present Levels & Your Child's Goals and Needs As an advocate, I consult with parents. Most parents report concerns about goals and placement. Mark Kamleiter, Florida parent attorney (St. Petersburg) used to say that parents and advocates often focus only on the "last pages" of the IEP. That is what I see, too. Present Levels are the Most Critical Part of the IEP The Present Levels are the foundation of the IEP. (The form your school uses may have each of these two levels in two separate sections). The Present Levels in all IEPs must include academic achievement and functional performance. 20 USC Sec. 1414(d)(1)(A)(i). Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition p. 99.
The student's Present Levels must always be accurate and up-to-date. When the IEP fails to include accurate and up-to-date information about the child's present levels, the IEP is defective. It has no foundation. Let's talk about the procedure that IEP Teams should follow when developing an IEP. This is where the IEP Team usually fills in the test scores and grades. However, this section is about much more than that. The Present Levels are the most important part of the IEP. It is also the section that most parents and advocates prepare for the least. The parents' input is most important during the IEP Team's assessment of the child's present levels of performance. Only the parents know how the child functions at home, in the community, when doing homework, at work, and in the real world. School attorney Joe Hatley says, The present levels of performance are the foundation for everything else in the IEP. If your starting point is fundamentally flawed, then everything that comes after that is flawed, too. Updating Present Levels Each time the IEP Team meets, it must update the child's Present Levels. The Katonah-Lewisboro (NY) School District failed to do this for one of its students. It simply copied the last year's "Present Levels" into the new IEP, despite information that the student made progress in all academic areas from the private placement the parents had secured the previous school year. The Second Circuit decision found that the child's IEP "was likely to cause [the student] to regress or make only trivial advancement." The school district's fatal flaw cost it dearly. The Court ordered it to pay the student's private placement tuition. It also had to pay the parents attorneys fees and expenses of over $156,976.00. You can read the decision here: To learn more about how to develop your child's Present Levels click the links below. https://www.wrightslaw.com/howey/iep.functional.perf.htm https://www.wrightslaw.com/howey/10tips.placement.htm Originally published on Pat Howey's Blog, Ask the Special Education Advocate at http://spedconsulting.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-foundation-of-iep.html Pat began her advocacy career as a volunteer for the Task Force on Education for the Handicapped (now InSource), Indiana’s Parent Training and Information Center. In 1990, she opened her advocacy practice and served families throughout Indiana by representing them at IEP meetings, mediation, and due process hearings. In 2017, Pat closed her advocacy practice and began working on a contract basis as a special education paralegal. Attorneys in Indiana, Texas, and California contracted with her to review documents, spot issues, draft due process complaints, prepare for hearings, and assist at hearings. In January 2019, she became an employee of the Connell Michael Kerr law firm, owned by Erin Connell, Catherine Michael, and Sonja Kerr. Her duties have now expanded to assisting with federal court cases. Contact Information Read more of Pat's answers to questions submitted by people just like
you in Wrightslaw's Ask
the Advocate section. Created: 11/07/12
Copyright © 1998-2026, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr
Wright. All rights reserved.
Contact Us |
Press l Mission l Our Awards l
Privacy
Policy l
Disclaimer l
Site Map |
||||||||||||||||||||||||