COVID-19   Law    Advocacy    Topics A-Z     Training    Wrights' Blog   Wrightslaw Store    Yellow Pages for Kids 
 Home  >  Advocacy Libraries  >  Newsletter Archives  >  2001  >  August 14

The Special Ed Advocate newsletter
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

Training Programs

Mar. 20-21 CA - Private

Apr. 11 - Denver, CO

June 5-8 - San Antonio, TX

Sept. 24 - MD via ZOOM

Full Schedule


Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Cool Tools
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
Newsletter Archives
Short Course Series
Success Stories

Law Library

Fed Court Complaints
IDEA 2004
McKinney-Vento Homeless
Section 504


American Indian
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
College/Continuing Ed
Due Process
Early Intervention
  (Part C)

Episodic, such as
   Allergies, Asthma,
   Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc

Future Planning
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE / Inclusion
Military / DOD
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Related Services
Research Based

Response to Intervention

Restraints / Seclusion
   and Abuse

School Report Cards
Section 504
Teachers & Principals
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
  Disability Groups
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

On August 13, 2001, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a U. S. District Court decision and ruled in favor of the child and parents in Amanda J. v. Clark County School District and Nevada Dept. of Education.

Pete says, "Amanda J. v. Clark County School District" is a well-written decision and a fascinating case. This case includes several unusual elements that attorneys can cite for different propositions. Attorneys and lay advocates should read this case carefully."

Unusual Elements

Two two years after moving to California, the family requested a due process hearing against Clark County School District in Nevada and the Nevada Department of Education.

Two months ago, the National Academy of Science issued a draft comprehensive report about autism and the use of Applied Behavioral Analysis or Lovaas therapy for children with autism. The decision references this report and includes the URL of the report is in a footnote.

The decision cites Families for Effective Autism Treatment (FEAT). We have
subscribed to the FEAT newsletter for several years. We have met and heard
Lenny Shafer speak, developed friendships with several FEAT principals, and were delighted to see the recognition of FEAT.

Twistis & Turns

The parents prevailed before a Hearing Officer but were reversed by the Review Officer. When the parents appealed to the U. S. District Court, they lost again. When they appealed to the Ninth Circuit, the three-judge panel reversed the District Court and reinstated the decision by the Hearing Officer.

The parents prevailed on procedural issues. Clark County School District violated the parent's rights. The school psychologist did not inform the parents that their child had characteristics of autism. The school district failed to provide the parents with copies of their child's evaluations.

Credibility of Witnesses

The credibility of the mother v. the school psychologist were at issue - and the mother prevailed.

According to the court, the Hearing Officer did not believe the school psychologist but found that the mother to be a credible witness. The case focused on whom to believe when there is conflicting testimony.

The Court of Appeals identified the school psychologist Mark Kenney and speech pathologist Christy Zuckerman by name.

Were the psychologist and speech pathologist acting as gatekeepers? Were
their actions independent and on their accord? Were they acting at the behest of school administrators within the system?

In most cases, there is a story behind the story.

Links: Amanda J. Case; New Autism Page

"Ninth Circuit Issues Strong Decision in Amanda J. v. Clark County" by Pete Wright.

Decision in Amanda J. v. Clark County Sch. Dist. and Nevada Dept of

NOTE: We added hyperlinks to other decisions cited and to relevant
portions of the IDEA statute in the decision.

News article from Las Vegas Review-Journal (08/14/01):

For information, articles and caselaw about autism, please visit our new
and growing Autism Page.

Subscription Information

The Special Ed Advocate is a free online newsletter about special education legal and advocacy issues, cases, tactics and strategy, and Internet resources.

Subscribers receive announcements and "alerts" about new cases, events, and special offers on Wrightslaw books.

To subscribe

Read Back issues of the Special Ed Advocate

Link To Us. Nearly 1,000 sites link to Wrightslaw. If you want to spread the word about special education advocacy, download a banner or image:


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 3rd Edition by Pete and Pam Wright
About the Book

To Order

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

To Order

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

To Order

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

To Order


Copyright 1998-2024, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map