COVID-19   Law    Advocacy    Topics A-Z     Training    Wrights' Blog   Wrightslaw Store    Yellow Pages for Kids 

 Home > Topics > S1571 Would Discriminate Against Children with Disabilities


The Special Ed Advocate newsletter
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

2024
Training Programs

Mar. 20-21 CA - Private

Apr. 11 - Denver, CO

June 5-8 - San Antonio, TX

Sept. 24 - MD via ZOOM

Full Schedule


Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Cool Tools
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Short Course Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
Fed Court Complaints
IDEA 2004
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
American Indian
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention
  (Part C)

Eligibility
Episodic, such as
   Allergies, Asthma,
   Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc

ESSA
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE / Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based
  Instruction

Response to Intervention
  (RTI)

Restraints / Seclusion
   and Abuse

Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 

S1571 Would Discriminate Against Children with Disabilities
By Sue Whitney, Wrightslaw Research Editor

Print this page

On October 19th, 2011 Senator Isakson (R-GA) is expected to offer an amendment, S 1571, to No Child Left behind during Senate Committee consideration of the Elementary and Secondary Education Reauthorization Act of 2011.

The amendment, S 1571, would discriminate against student with disabilities by allowing schools to significantly lower the academic expectations for students with disabilities, based on their scores in state accountability tests.

This use of this test, for this purpose, would apply only to children with disabilities. S 1571 would provide additional remediation to a student who scored poorly on the state accountability test, unless that child had a disability.

The first rule of evaluation is to use a test for the purpose for which it was designed. The state accountability tests were designed to assess what a child had been taught, not what the child is able to learn.  IDEA already has provisions in place to provide an alternative or modified curriculum for children who are unable to learn the regular education curriculum. These decisions are made based on valid assessments and by the child’s IEP team.

Opposition to the Bill

The Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, which includes the National Association of School Psychologists and the National Association of State Directors of Special Education, wrote to Chairman Tom Harkin of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on October 14th to voice their opposition to this bill http://www.copaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/CCD-S-1571-sign-on-letter-final_101211.pdf.

The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates prepared a fact sheet outlining some of the main points of this bill http://www.copaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Isakson-Amendment-One-pager.pdf.

This bill would discriminate against children based upon the subgroup into which their state accountability test scores are assigned.

Do Something Today!

Write to your Senator. Tell your Senator to vote NO on the Isakson Amendment because all children deserve equal access to education.

It is especially important to contact members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee. The HELP Committee has members from these states:

Alaska
Kansas
Pennsylvania
Arizona
Kentucky
Rhode Island
Colorado
Maryland
Tennessee
Connecticut
Minnesota
Utah
Georgia
New Mexico
Vermont
Illinois
North Carolina
Washington
Iowa
Oregon
Wyoming

The Isakson amendment would remove the existing limits on the number of  students with disabilities who  can be counted as making sufficient progress using a less challenging systems of standards and assessments.

If this amendment passes, schools would be allowed to take millions of students with disabilities off track for a regular high school diploma as early as 3rd grade, simply because they receive special education services. 

Most students with disabilities are able to learn and achieve when given the appropriate services and supports.  The overuse of alternate assessments based on educationally unsound use of state accountability tests would negate the advances made in educating students with disabilities over the past 10 years.

Your Message: Vote NO on S 1571

1. CALL your Senators today! 202-224-3121 (TTY 202-225-1904).

2. Find your Senator and contact information using this link www.senate.gov.  Ask for the staff member who handles education or disability.  Tell them to vote NO on the Isakson Amendment.

3. E-mail: You can e-mail your Senators using this link http://1.usa.gov/Senat .

Below is the message suggested by the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates:

Members of Congress pay particular attention to personalized messages from their constituents. Include a personal story about how your child has had academic success and has achieved in the regular classroom with his/her peers due to high expectations and appropriate services and support.

Message:  Vote NO on Isakson amendment to lift caps on alternate assessments for students with disabilities.

Dear Senator (on HELP Committee):

Under current law and regulations, States have established a set of assessments and modified (lower) standards for children with disabilities who are supposedly not able to achieve based on regular assessments and standards.  This is commonly referred to as the 2% regulation.  Under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, States presently are permitted to only use a limited amount of these assessment results in their accountability systems, the results of approximately 20% of students with disabilities.  There is also a similar regulation for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities which also limits the number of results for accountability purposes to approximately 10% of students with disabilities.  This is commonly referred to as the 1% regulation.

The Isakson amendment would remove the limits on how many students with disabilities can be counted as making sufficient progress using less challenging systems of standards and assessments.  This amendment would allow schools to take millions of students with disabilities off track for a regular high school diploma as early as 3rd grade when assessment decisions are made in schools, relegating them to lower career and college expectations—simply because they receive special education services.

Please vote NO on this amendment so that students with disabilities can have the same opportunities to achieve college and career ready standards as all other students.

Action Alert: https://www.wrightslaw.com/nltr/11/al.1017.esea.htm

Created: 10/17/11
Revised:

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 3rd Edition by Pete and Pam Wright
About the Book

To Order

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

To Order

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

To Order

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

To Order

 

Copyright © 1998-2024, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map

March Sale - SAVE 25%

Print, Immediate Downloads
and Advocacy Supplies
Order Wrightslaw Product
s
and Save 25% Now!



Check Out
The Advocate's Store!

Wrightslaw on FacebookWrightslaw on TwitterWrightslaw YouTube Channel 

Wrightslaw Books
Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 3rd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: From Emotions to Advocacy, 2nd Edition
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Wrightslaw: Special Education Legal Developments and Cases 2019
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video


The Advocate's Store


Understanding Your Child's
Test Scores (1.5 hrs)

Wrightslaw Special: $14.95