Wrightslaw l No Child Left Behind l IDEA 2004 l Fetaweb l Yellow Pages for Kids l Harbor House Law Press
 Home > Ask the Advocate > Feeling Guilty About Asking for Special Ed Services? Remember the Domino Effect by Pat Howey

The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2014 - 2015 Training Programs

Oct 23 - Wilton, CT

Oct 25 - Olympia, WA

Oct 30 - Phoenix, AZ

Nov 6 - McAllen, TX

Nov 18 - DesMoines, IA

Nov 21 - Temecula, CA

Dec 4 - OKC, OK

Full Schedule

Be a Hero ...

 Jason at Ft. Benning
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
New! Military Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Summer School Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
Fed Court Complaints

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
ISEA
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 
Feeling Guilty About Asking For Special Ed Services? Remember the Domino Effect
by Pat Howey, Advocate

Print this page

Many parents feel guilty about asking the school to provide a specific service or device for their child. If your child needs a particular service or device, it is unlikely that he or she is the only child who has this need.

When you achieve a new benefit, program, or related service for your child, the "system" will often find other children who will also benefit from what it is required to provide for your child to justify its actions.

I call this the “domino effect.” Schools call it “opening the floodgates.”

Lessons from Our Due Process Hearing

In 1987, we requested a due process hearing for our child. During and after the hearing, welearned several important lessons including how it benefitted other children.

Laptop Computer

when we requested a due process hearing for our child, one issue was whether she needed a laptop computer. (This was before the term “assistive technology” was in the law). In settlement negotiations during the hearing, the school agreed to provide the computer.

However, the school did not purchase one computer - it purchased three computers. Two other children benefited from what were able to obtain for our child. After the school crossed that bridge, many other children have received laptop computers to assist them in their education.

Adaptive Physical Education

A second issue in our hearing was whether my child required Adaptive Physical Education (APE). At the time of our hearing in 1987, APE was not provided to any child in the entire county. The hearing officer ruled that my child did require adaptive physical education.

When the next school year began, the school had hired a physical education teacher with a masters degree in adaptive physical education. Since 1988, APE has been provided to hundreds of children in our county.

Direct Physical Therapy (PT) & Occupational Therapy (OT)

A third issue in our due process hearing was whether my child needed direct Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT).

At the time of our due process hearing, the school contracted with one physical and occupational therapist for six hours a week. Children who needed PT or OT received these services through a "consultation" model. A “gross motor aide” who was paid minimum wage and who was required to have a General Equivalency (GED) or High School diploma (but who had no training in PT or OT) provided children with “exercises.”

The hearing officer ruled that my child required direct PT and OT services.

As a result, since 1988, hundreds of children in our county have received direct services from Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists, Physical Therapy Assistants (PTA), and Certified Occupational Therapy Assistants (COTA).

The school has at least two full time physical and occupational therapists on staff during the year.

Many, many children now receive direct PT and OT services. Some continue to receive "exercises" from a gross motor aide, probably because their parents do not know what their children are receiving.

Strong Parent Advocacy Leads to Changes in the System

Our due process hearing was well publicized. It was open to the public, with television cameras and radio reporters in attendance. We invited parents to attend, so they could see what an actual hearing was all about.

After our hearing, six more parents requested hearings. Some cases were settled. Others went to hearing. Many other parents filed successful state and OCR complaints.

The voters in our county elected several new new school board members. Two superintendents eventually retired or resigned. The special ed director chose early retirement

Lessons Learned

I do not recommend that all parents take public stances in their disputes with their schools. This is an individual decision that each parent must make, based on the issues and facts of their own case.

In 1987, my child was in the second grade. None of her friends read the paper or watched the news. The publicity had little impact on her. Had she been older, our decision to go public in our dispute with the school may have been different to protect her privacy.

For those parents who have strong family support and the courage to publicize their special ed issues, your bravado can provide a valuable learning experience for other parents of children with special needs.

You will make some enemies. You will make some new friends. You will learn who your true friends are.

Epilogue


In the fall of 2000, thirteen years after our due process hearing, I met a retired teacher who recalled our hearing. She thanked me. As a direct result of our hearing, she was able to obtain services for her children she had never been able to obtain before.

Individual parent advocacy does make a systemic impact. Sometimes the impact is greater than you know.

However, individual advocacy is a slow, slow process. This process has taught me more about patience than any other experience in my life.

That’s why I continue to go through life “Changing the World – One Child at a Time.”

Created: 01/01/05
Revised: 03/07/06


Meet Pat Howey

Pat Howey is an Indiana advocate who has helped parents obtain special education services for their children with disabilities since 1986. She also helps parents resolve special education disputes with their school districts. (If Pat cannot assist you, she will refer you to attorneys for legal advice and assistance.)

Pat is active in several legal and advocacy organizations including The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates. She is the author of many articles that are featured in Ask the Advocate.

Pat is a member of the Wrightslaw Speakers Bureau. She provides special education advocacy training for parents, educators, and others who want to ensure that children receive quality special education services. Her training programs are designed to meet the needs of parents, educators, health care providers, advocates, and attorneys who represent children with disabilities. Learn more.

Contact Information
Pat Howey
Special Education Consulting
POB 117
West Point, Indiana 47992-0117
Website: patriciahowey.com
Email: specialedconsulting@gmail.com

"Changing the World -- One Child at at Time
.
"

Copyright © 2005 Pat Howey

Revised 03/22/2012

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

 

Copyright 1998-2014, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map

What's New!

Now Shipping!

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Check it out!

Wrightslaw Store

The Advocate's Store

Get Help!

Blog the Wrightslaw

Wrightslaw on Facebook

Find us on Facebook

Wrightslaw Books

Student Discounts

Military Discounts


Wrightslaw: All About IEPs

About the Book
To Order

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book
To Order


About the Book

To Order


Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board

About the DVD Video
To Order


To Order


Wrightslaw: No Child Left Behind

About the Book
To Order

Wrightslaw Multimedia Training


Understanding Your Child's
Test Scores (1.5 hrs)

Understanding Your Child's Test Scores

Learn More
To Order
Retail Price: $
24.95
Wrightslaw Special: $14.95

Special Education Law & Advocacy Training
(6.5 hrs)


Wrightslaw WebEx Special Education Law & Training Program (6.5 hrs)


Learn More
To Order
Retail Price: $99.95
Wrightslaw Special: $49.95