Wrights
law


The Special Ed Advocate Newsletter
July 5, 2001

 Home  >  Advocacy Libraries  >  Newsletter Archives  >  2001  >  July 5

Home  
Issue: 120
ISSN: 1538-3202


The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2015 Training Programs

Jan 16 - School District, LA

Jan 24 - Corpus Christi, TX

Jan 24 - Pensacola, FL

Jan 31 - Champaign, IL

Feb 19 - Lincroft, NJ

Feb 24 - Knoxville, TN

Feb 26 - Memphis, TN

Full Schedule

Be a Hero ...

 Jason at Ft. Benning
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
New! Military Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Summer School Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
Fed Court Complaints

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
ISEA
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 

Highlights: In special issue about FAPE, learn definitions and caselaw about "free appropriate public education" and educational benefit; check new FAPE info page.

Subscribers as of July 4, 2001: 26,613

The Special Ed Advocate newsletter is free - please forward the newsletter or the subscription link to friends and colleagues so they can learn about special education law and advocacy too!

Wrightslaw flyer


Special Issue: Learning about FAPE

1. Introduction: FAPE

Did you take our new IEP Quiz?

If you read the article and took the Quiz, you learned that to advocate for your child, you need to learn about the law and how to use the law without starting no-win battles with the school.

Few parents and educators read statutes, regulations and cases to learn about legal rights and responsibilities. Most people get information from articles, listserv advice, and informal discussions with others.

Your knowledge will rise no higher than your source. To learn about your legal rights, responsibilities, and get answers to legal questions, you must read and reread the law.


2. Definitions: FAPE

FAPE is an individualized educational program that is designed to meet the child's unique needs and from which the child receives educational benefit.

The legal concept of "FAPE" is shorthand for "free, appropriate public education." FAPE is defined in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997 (IDEA) at 20 U. S. C. § 1401(8). (WRIGHTSLAW: SPECIAL
EDUCATION LAW, page 27)

The term is also defined in the Code of Federal Regulations at 34 C.F.R. § 300.13. (WRIGHTSLAW: SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW, page 142)


3. Caselaw: FAPE

To be an effective advocate, you must read cases that are often hard to understand. If you read a case several times and don't understand what the case means, don't give up! You are not alone.

Legal decisions are often hard to understand. When you read caselaw, you will see why you receive conflicting opinions and advice about a legal issue.

KNABLE V. BEXLEY

A few months ago, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a well-written decision in Knable v. Bexley about FAPE, IEPs, IEP meetings, procedural and substantive violations, and tuition reimbursement.

The school district appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court.

On June 30, the U. S. Supreme Court announced that it would not hear the district's appeal. The pro-child decision in Knable stands.

BACKGROUND OF CASE

In Knable v. Bexley, the school district evaluated the child and concluded that he had a severe behavior disorder and was eligible for special education services. Despite this, school did not offer an IEP -- for nearly two years.

After Justin was discharged from a psychiatric hospital, the school devised a "plan" to deal with his behavior. However, the Court found that "Justin did almost no work at school, spent a great deal of time in the principal's office, and failed three of his seven subjects." He was disrespectful and disruptive at school.

REQUESTS FOR AN IEP

During meetings with school officials, Justin's parents requested an IEP. They wrote a letter requesting an IEP. Although the school advised them that an IEP was "forthcoming," no IEP was developed. Eventually, the parents began to explore residential placements on their own. They wrote a letter and requested an IEP. The district responded by sending the parents a "draft" IEP.

When the district did not meet with them to develop an IEP, the parents placed their son in Grove School. By the end of seventh grade at Grove School, Justin "received all As and Bs on his report card."

The parents requested a due process hearing. Because the school did not provide Justin with a free appropriate public education (FAPE), the parents requested reimbursement for his tuition at the private school.

MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF THE IDEA

In Knable, the court discusses child find, IEPs and IEP meetings, relief available under the IDEA, and standard of review. The Court found that the school district violated several procedural and substantive requirements of the IDEA:

* Bexley failed to convene an IEP conference;
* Bexley's procedural violation denied Justin a FAPE;
* Bexley's "draft" IEP was not reasonably calculated to enable Justin to receive educational benefit;
* Bexley's "draft" IEP did not offer an appropriate program;
* Bexley's "draft" IEP did not include present performance levels, goals and objectives, and special education and related services that would be provided;
* Bexley's "draft" or proposed IEP was not free - the parents were required to to exhaust their insurance coverage before the district would pay for Justin's education.

TUITION REIMBURSEMENT

Citing CARTER, the Court found that for parents to be reimbursed for a private school placement, they must demonstrate -

* that the district did not provide FAPE
* that their unilateral placement was proper

As in CARTER, the district argued that the parents could not be reimbursed because Grove School was not the "least restrictive" placement. They also argued that the private placement was too expensive. The Court disagreed.

The Court noted that "parents who have not been treated properly under the IDEA and who unilaterally withdraw their child from public school will commonly place their child in a private school that specializes in teaching children with disabilities. We would vitiate the right of parental placement recognized in Burlington and Carter were we to find
that such private school placements automatically violated the IDEA's mainstreaming requirement."

Download, print and read this well-written decision.


4. New at Wrightslaw - FAPE Page

If you have a child with a disability, your child is entitled to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). To answer questions about FAPE, we built a special FAPE page with links to articles, law and regulations, and other information about FAPE.

Visit our new Topics page for information about dozens of topics:


5. Get answers to questions with Wrightslaw: Special Education Law

Special education law is confusing to most parents, educators, and even to many attorneys. Although parents represent their child's interests, few parents understand their rights and responsibilities. Many teachers receive inaccurate information about the law.

What does the law say about evaluations and reevaluations? Test procedures? Eligibility?

What does the law say about Individualized Educational Programs (IEPs) and IEP teams? IEP Goals, objectives, benchmarks? What does the law say about inclusion? Least restrictive environment?

What does the law say about discipline? Positive behavioral intervention plans? Interim alternative placements? Manifestation Review Hearings? What does the law say about parent notice? Independent educational evaluations? Tuition reimbursement? Mediation? Due process?

Where can you get answers to your questions about special education law? Look it up in Wrightslaw: Special Education Law!

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law helps you find answers to your questions
about the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law is designed to to meet the needs of
school psychologists and educational diagnosticians, advocates and attorneys, school administrators - and especially the needs of the parents and teachers who are working in the trenches.

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law has been endorsed by university professors, disabilities groups, educators, parents, child advocates, and attorneys.

The Deluxe Edition comes with a Legal Companion CD-ROM that includes:

* Law Book as one PDF File
* Law Book, by Chapter for easier research
* Federal Register, March 12, 1999 (Vol. 64, No. 48). Includes IDEA Regulations with extensive explanations, commentary and attachments.
* IDEA Compliance Report, "Back to School on Civil Rights," published by the National Council on Disability. Hundreds of hyperlinks.

Click here to Order Wrightslaw: Special Education Law from our 24 hour 7 days a week online store!

By Phone: Call toll-free 877 LAW IDEA (877-529-4332) between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., E.T.

By Mail and Fax: http://www.wrightslaw.com/bkstore/ourbooks/Orderform.html

For more information, please visit our website


Subscription Information

The Special Ed Advocate is a free online newsletter about special education legal and advocacy issues, cases, tactics and strategy, and Internet resources.

Subscribers receive announcements and "alerts" about new cases, events, and special offers on Wrightslaw books.

To subscribe

Read Back issues of the Special Ed Advocate

LINK TO US. Nearly 1,000 sites link to Wrightslaw. If you want to spread the word about special education advocacy, download a banner or image:

Home

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

 

Copyright 1998-2014, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map