|Home > Advocacy Libraries > Newsletter Archives > 2001 > July 5|
Highlights: In special issue about FAPE, learn definitions and caselaw about "free appropriate public education" and educational benefit; check new FAPE info page.
Subscribers as of July 4, 2001: 26,613
The Special Ed Advocate newsletter is free - please forward the newsletter or the subscription link to friends and colleagues so they can learn about special education law and advocacy too!
Special Issue: Learning about FAPE
1. Introduction: FAPE
Did you take our new IEP Quiz?
If you read the article and took the Quiz, you learned that to advocate for your child, you need to learn about the law and how to use the law without starting no-win battles with the school.
Few parents and educators read statutes, regulations and cases to learn about legal rights and responsibilities. Most people get information from articles, listserv advice, and informal discussions with others.
Your knowledge will rise no higher than your source. To learn about your legal rights, responsibilities, and get answers to legal questions, you must read and reread the law.
2. Definitions: FAPE
FAPE is an individualized educational program that is designed to meet the child's unique needs and from which the child receives educational benefit.
The legal concept of "FAPE"
is shorthand for "free, appropriate public education."
FAPE is defined in the Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act of 1997 (IDEA) at 20 U. S. C. § 1401(8). (WRIGHTSLAW:
The term is also defined in the Code of Federal Regulations at 34 C.F.R. § 300.13. (WRIGHTSLAW: SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW, page 142)
3. Caselaw: FAPE
To be an effective advocate, you must read cases that are often hard to understand. If you read a case several times and don't understand what the case means, don't give up! You are not alone.
Legal decisions are often hard to understand. When you read caselaw, you will see why you receive conflicting opinions and advice about a legal issue.
KNABLE V. BEXLEY
A few months ago, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a well-written decision in Knable v. Bexley about FAPE, IEPs, IEP meetings, procedural and substantive violations, and tuition reimbursement.
The school district appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court.
On June 30, the U. S. Supreme Court announced that it would not hear the district's appeal. The pro-child decision in Knable stands.
BACKGROUND OF CASE
In Knable v. Bexley, the school district evaluated the child and concluded that he had a severe behavior disorder and was eligible for special education services. Despite this, school did not offer an IEP -- for nearly two years.
After Justin was discharged from a psychiatric hospital, the school devised a "plan" to deal with his behavior. However, the Court found that "Justin did almost no work at school, spent a great deal of time in the principal's office, and failed three of his seven subjects." He was disrespectful and disruptive at school.
REQUESTS FOR AN IEP
During meetings with school officials, Justin's parents requested an IEP. They wrote a letter requesting an IEP. Although the school advised them that an IEP was "forthcoming," no IEP was developed. Eventually, the parents began to explore residential placements on their own. They wrote a letter and requested an IEP. The district responded by sending the parents a "draft" IEP.
When the district did not meet with them to develop an IEP, the parents placed their son in Grove School. By the end of seventh grade at Grove School, Justin "received all As and Bs on his report card."
The parents requested a due process hearing. Because the school did not provide Justin with a free appropriate public education (FAPE), the parents requested reimbursement for his tuition at the private school.
MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF THE IDEA
In Knable, the court discusses child find, IEPs and IEP meetings, relief available under the IDEA, and standard of review. The Court found that the school district violated several procedural and substantive requirements of the IDEA:
* Bexley failed to convene an
Citing CARTER, the Court found that for parents to be reimbursed for a private school placement, they must demonstrate -
* that the district did not provide
As in CARTER, the district argued that the parents could not be reimbursed because Grove School was not the "least restrictive" placement. They also argued that the private placement was too expensive. The Court disagreed.
The Court noted that "parents
who have not been treated properly under the IDEA and who unilaterally
withdraw their child from public school will commonly place
their child in a private school that specializes in teaching
children with disabilities. We would vitiate the right of parental
placement recognized in Burlington and Carter were we to find
4. New at Wrightslaw - FAPE Page
If you have a child with a disability, your child is entitled to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). To answer questions about FAPE, we built a special FAPE page with links to articles, law and regulations, and other information about FAPE.
5. Get answers to questions with Wrightslaw: Special Education Law
Special education law is confusing to most parents, educators, and even to many attorneys. Although parents represent their child's interests, few parents understand their rights and responsibilities. Many teachers receive inaccurate information about the law.
What does the law say about evaluations and reevaluations? Test procedures? Eligibility?
What does the law say about Individualized Educational Programs (IEPs) and IEP teams? IEP Goals, objectives, benchmarks? What does the law say about inclusion? Least restrictive environment?
What does the law say about discipline? Positive behavioral intervention plans? Interim alternative placements? Manifestation Review Hearings? What does the law say about parent notice? Independent educational evaluations? Tuition reimbursement? Mediation? Due process?
Where can you get answers to your questions about special education law? Look it up in Wrightslaw: Special Education Law!
Wrightslaw: Special Education
Law helps you find answers to your questions
Wrightslaw: Special Education
Law is designed to to meet the needs of
Wrightslaw: Special Education Law has been endorsed by university professors, disabilities groups, educators, parents, child advocates, and attorneys.
The Deluxe Edition comes with a Legal Companion CD-ROM that includes:
* Law Book as one PDF File
By Phone: Call toll-free 877 LAW IDEA (877-529-4332) between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., E.T.
By Mail and Fax: http://www.wrightslaw.com/bkstore/ourbooks/Orderform.html
The Special Ed Advocate is a free online newsletter about special education legal and advocacy issues, cases, tactics and strategy, and Internet resources.
Subscribers receive announcements and "alerts" about new cases, events, and special offers on Wrightslaw books.
Read Back issues of the Special Ed Advocate
LINK TO US. Nearly 1,000 sites link to Wrightslaw. If you want to spread the word about special education advocacy, download a banner or image: