Wrightslaw.com logo

Bookmark and Share
Google
web www.Wrightslaw.com
Wrightslaw l No Child Left Behind l IDEA 2004 l Fetaweb l Yellow Pages for Kids l Harbor House Law Press
 Home > Advocacy Library  > Letters to Wrightslaw > Subject: Learning Hard Lessons

The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2010 Training Programs

  March - LA, IL, CA, MI

April - OH, IA, NJ, MD
Full Schedule

Get Help!

Yellow Pages for Kids

Be a Hero ...

 
Candle in window
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
 Summer School
   for Parents 2008
 Summer School
   for Advocates 2009

Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups

  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
 
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms

Best School Websites
 

Letter From Rose
Subject: My Advice to Parents

Print this page

Hi Pete & Pam:

I've been at this advocacy business for a while - and I'm still learning. I’m sending you this letter in hopes that it will help other parents avoid the mistakes I made.

Over the past year, the situation at school escalated for both of my sons. One of my sons has PDD, the other has a nonverbal learning disability (NLD).

Finally, I reached the point of frustration with my district. I sent two well-written letters detailing my complaints. I sent these letters certified, return-receipt, and included a copy to the Superintendent and Special Ed Director. Soon after this, I received a phone call from the Sped Supervisor. She wanted us "to meet so we can work things out."

She sounded nice and sincere. She seemed to understand my frustration. She suggested that I call her any time. She even gave me her home phone number so we could "talk things out."

I trusted her. I thought she was interested in building a real "collaborative" relationship with parents.

Earlier, I had called our Complaint Officer for guidance about my son’s IEPs. After I told him the whole story, he said "Send a letter to the Sped Director and copy me ("MAKE SURE YOU DO THIS" he said . . . along with a sensible lecture that I don't understand how many parents don't do this even though he tells them to . . . ).

I assured him that I would follow his advice.

I wrote the letter, with a copy to him, as he advised. I thought my conversation with him was the beginning of a complaint/resolution process. It scared me a little, but I felt we were right.

I'm still kicking myself. I never sent that letter.

Instead, I gave a copy of the letter to my new friend, the Sped Supervisor. I told her that I hadn't decided what I would do with the letter.

This was a very stupid move on my part - to think that this letter would "threaten" the district into compliance (for lack of a better term).

WRONG!

After I rejected the second draft of my son’s IEP, my new friend, the ever-pleasant Sped Supv, was clearly annoyed with me. She said "No disrespect intended but you are not a professional. This method was used with MY son and it was fantastic." (What works for one child must work for all children? Doesn’t this take the "I" out of "IEP"?).

I started to review what had really changed for my children since I began "collaborating" with the Sped Supv.

NOTHING had changed!

What lessons have I learned? First, I was too trusting. In truth, I wanted to avoid conflict or confrontation. Second, by giving them my complaint letter, I told them where I was coming from. Now, they had MY evidence. Two months had passed for my sons during this "collaboration period" and nothing had changed.

Parents must send letters to set things straight. When you write letters, people HAVE to listen. People CANNOT interrupt. People CANNOT ignore you or brush you off. Now, when I write letters, I add that I want them to respond in writing.

Funny - after I started writing letters, things changed.

My message to parents is this: Don't try to "make friends" with school staff. This won’t accomplish much for your child or children. And, if things don’t work out, you’ll be twice as mad because you’ll feel they betrayed you.

Rose

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright Wrightslaw: All About IEPs Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the Book
To Order
About the Book
To Order
About the Book
To Order
About the DVD Video
To Order

Copyright © 1998-2010, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press | EspañolMission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map