Wrightslaw l No Child Left Behind l IDEA 2004 l Fetaweb l Yellow Pages for Kids l Harbor House Law Press
 Home > Advocacy Library  > Letters to Wrightslaw > Letter from Debbie re special education  placement


The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2014 - 2015 Training Programs

Oct 25 - Olympia, WA

Oct 30 - Phoenix, AZ

Nov. 1 - Grand Rapids, MI

Nov 6 - McAllen, TX

Nov 18 - DesMoines, IA

Nov 21 - Temecula, CA

Dec 4 - OKC, OK

Full Schedule

Be a Hero ...

 Jason at Ft. Benning
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
New! Military Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Summer School Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
Fed Court Complaints

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
ISEA
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 

Print this page

Debbie from New York has a 7 year old son with autism. Debbie just requested a special education due process hearing about her son's placement.

Sun, 5 Jul 1998 19:37:31 EDT

Dear Wrights,

Your help and advice as supplied on your web site continues to be invaluable.

To refresh your memory, my son Kevin is a 7 year old with autism. I have been trying to get the school district to change the placement they intend for Kevin next year.

Kevin has been in a "regular ed." first grade. I requested standardized testing in reading and math this year. He tests a full grade level behind in both areas. Yet his teacher describes the "good progress" he has made.

I knew that Kevin's progress next year would hinge on his placement in a visually rich program. Fortunately, there is just such a teacher/room in our district. I approached the CSE chair about this concern. He told me that which teacher Kevin has is completely out of the CSE's hands because Kevin is in a "regular ed" program. Over the last 3 months, I met with Kevin's (then) teacher, the elementary school principal, the district superintendent, and the Board of Education. All refused to place Kevin in the visual program, instead deferring to the recommendation of this year's teacher.

I consulted with an area education law attorney, who sent a letter to request an impartial due process hearing. She said that the organization of my material, the fact that I had taped meetings and that I placed my concerns in clearly written, civilly phrased letters would all make our case much stronger. (Thank you Pete!)

At the meeting with the Board of Education, I handed out my document, clearly stating what I was asking for, citing the supporting test results and quotes from meetings, and ending with the request for the change of placement. The Board president commented on how well written it was. He described it as "superb." And I have it on tape.

We never know what the future will bring. I cannot foretell what a hearing officer will do. But I know that our chances are much better because I had and used the excellent information you have so generously provided. I will keep you informed.

Sincerely.

Debbie



Mon, 06 Jul 1998 09:59 am

Debbie:

Thanks for taking the time to write and update us. We often wonder what happens to the families we communicate with.

Your situation shows what a big role parents can play, if they know how to go about it. This means doing what you are doing - getting all your material organized and making a clear request about what you want (and many parents have a very hard time w this one - they know that what the child is getting is not working but they don't have an alternative suggestion).

You taped the meetings, wrote clear letters that didn't threaten - and you went to the school board to make your case.

Your letter will give parents hope and a sense of direction when they wonder "what do I do?" - and the nudge they need to get started.

Again, many thanks!

Pete and Pam Wright

http//:www.wrightslaw.com
The Special Ed Advocate



Tue, 14 Jul 1998 19:52:09 EDT

Dear Wrights,

The school district received the letter requesting an impartial due process hearing on Monday, July 6. On Wednesday, July 8 there was a Board of Education meeting. I found out that the letter was brought to the board after that meeting. On Thursday, July 9, the district superintendent called me and said the district was "not interested in pursuing an impartial hearing."

In other words, we won.

Kevin will be placed in the visually based class next year. I have already spoken to the teacher (she called me). She is enthusiastic about what she and Kevin can together accomplish next year.

I'm very glad we did not have to go through with the hearing although we were prepared to do so if necessary. I feel we gave the district a way to change position yet still save face (the lawyer made them do it).

It can be characterized as a "win-win" solution.

Thanks again for all your great suggestions and advice.

Debbie

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

 

Copyright 1998-2014, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map

What's New!

Now Shipping!

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Check it out!

Wrightslaw Store

The Advocate's Store

Get Help!

Blog the Wrightslaw

Wrightslaw on Facebook

Find us on Facebook

Wrightslaw Books

Student Discounts

Military Discounts


Wrightslaw: All About IEPs

About the Book
To Order

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book
To Order


About the Book

To Order


Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board

About the DVD Video
To Order


To Order


Wrightslaw: No Child Left Behind

About the Book
To Order

Wrightslaw Multimedia Training


Understanding Your Child's
Test Scores (1.5 hrs)

Understanding Your Child's Test Scores

Learn More
To Order
Retail Price: $
24.95
Wrightslaw Special: $14.95

Special Education Law & Advocacy Training
(6.5 hrs)


Wrightslaw WebEx Special Education Law & Training Program (6.5 hrs)


Learn More
To Order
Retail Price: $99.95
Wrightslaw Special: $49.95