|Home > Advocacy Library > Letters to Wrightslaw > About School's Responsibilities|
Gary asks, "What Obligations Does the School Have?"
A 15 year old male is diagnosed as "seriously emotionally disturbed." Academically, he is functioning on approximately 2nd grade level. Current placement is 23.5 hours a week in a self-contained classroom, with 7.5 hours in general education. This placement is because of behavior problems.
School problem behaviors include, but are not limited to: Cursing, threatening to kill teachers, threatening to kill administrators, fighting with peers, jumped out of moving school bus to fight another student, spitting on peer. Non-compliant. Total disregard for authority figures.
Home behavior includes: Running away, non-compliance, starting fires, threatening adults, threating to kill people at school, threatening to blow up school, etc.
He was placed in residential treatment facility on an emergency basis. Because of insurance issues, he will be released in 48 hours. This placement was done by law enforcement and health agencies after a blow up at home.
School officials have met many times to review placement, goals and needs.
What obligations does the school system have? Must the school continue to provide special education services in the current setting if they believe the student is a danger to himself or others? What if the school has no alternative placement within the system that is appropriate? What about the safety of the other students, teachers, administrators?
A psychological report confirms that the student is a danger, capable of shooting others. This situation is immediate. Please respond.
Regarding the school's legal obligations, you should read the U. S. Supreme Court's decision in Honig v. Doe which was issued in 1988. The facts in Honig are similar to the facts you describe in your "hypothetical case."
citation for Honig v. Doe is 484 U.S. 305. This case is
in the Supreme Court section of FindLaw at
Honig v. Doe is also in our new book, Wrightslaw: Special Education Law
You need to know what is driving this kid to be the way he is. Did he pop out of the womb as an angry vicious young man? Or did his anger develop slowly over time?
Schools often develop treatment plans (IEPs) without adequately studying the case history and why previous efforts failed or exacerbated the problem. As the kid gets worse, schools (and society) blame the kid, instead of looking at what should have been done and was not done, and what can be done now.
This is why, when I am consulted about a case, I insist on seeing the earliest reports and test data, I read everything in chronological order, pre-school and KG reports first, so I can see how the child evolved and what happened. By the time I get to the end of the very thick file, it all clicks and makes sense. The present situation is absolutely predictable. What to do?
Get the entire file, put it all in chronological order, read through it slowly and carefully. Take all standardized test data, especially subtest data, and make a rough chart of the scores. This will help you see what happened. This will take several hours, but you'll probably have some good answers about what the true problem is -- but probably not the solution. Coming up with the correct solution may require additional testing to narrow down, diagnose, and set up a treament plan. It is hard work, but this is what it takes to change a child, not just pass the child on to someone else so he becomes their problem.
Shift to the medical model: Assume that you are a medical doctor. You are treating a patient for a cold. Several weeks have passed but your patient's cold hasn't gotten better. Instead, the patient continues to complain, is listless, the cough has worsened. Now, the patient is wheezing. Do you continue with the same treatment? Do you prescribe more cough medicine? Do you do a more thorough diagnostic workup? Do you think the patient coughing willfully? Do you decide that the patient is "choosing" to cough? Do you blame the patient when the situation spirals out of control?
Why is this kid's skills at the second grade level after roughly 10 years of education?
How can middle school and high school kids function with second grade skills? Why are schools are content with this? Why are we surprised when kids erupt after years of frustration and failure? Who failed?
Private sector schools like Kildonan and Trident Academy take kids whose skills are many years delayed and teach basic reading, writing, spelling, and arithmetic skills. If the kid masters these basic skills, he will be able to learn other things through life.
Your kid probably needs to work with someone who is qualified and trained in Orton-Gillingham and can work with him several hours a day, one on one, to jump start his skills.
Many schools are inflexible and cannot/ will not provide this. So another lost angry kid is thrust out into society, takes his frustrations out on others, and is incarcerated.
Has a Functional Behavioral Assessment been completed on this child?
the new article in the Wrightslaw Advocacy Library about Functional
At this point, you may be tempted to say, "Pete Wright is a lawyer-what does he know about life in the trenches with these kids?"
I used to work as a house parent in a juvenile training school and was assigned to cottage / unit for most serious offenders (rapists, murderers, violent offenders). After I graduated from college, I was a counselor in juvenile training schools (worked at three) and also worked as a juvenile probation officer in City of Richmond VA.
As a probation officer, I got a federal grant and designed a program for the most serious offenders. The program was called the "Mobile Probation and Camping Program" -- it received some national publicity between 1972-1974. We had an experimental and control group - we had kids in each group. The control group received the regular probation program. We wanted kids who had already acted out and were destined to commit more major offenses soon, but who had not yet been incarcerated. All kids who were involved in this program had been convicted of several felonies (crimes against persons or property, not drug offenses.) The kids averaged 5.5 prior felony convictions.
As part of the program, I obtained educational, neurological, psychological evaluations from the Medical College of Virginia. (As the P.O., I did the social histories). Of the 15 kids in our experimental group, 13 had documented neurological problems related to LD issues, processing problems, etc. The two who did not have neuro issues had severe child abuse in early years (cigarette scars from burns inflicted by parents, etc.)
Their IQ's were within average range but their skills in reading, writing, spelling, and math were very low, averaging around 2nd to 3rd grade. We used a wilderness camping model known as the "Campbell Loughmiller" approach (from Texas) that was based on Reality Therapy. We arranged for special ed graduate students to provide one-on-one tutoring for each kid. The tutors focused primarily on teaching the kid to read.
Soon after the tutoring began, the kids' scores in reading, writing, spelling and arithmetic skills went up quickly. Their grades improved and school attendance improved significantly. Physical appearances improved. Self-concepts improved too. After a year or so, there was such an astounding difference that the program was written up as a model project under the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA).
Why do we have to reinvent the wheel again and again?
By the way,
the book Reality
Therapy, by William Glasser, is a classic.