The Special Ed Advocate:
IEPs, Draft IEPs, and
Roadmap to the IEP

Wrightslaw Home       Law      Advocacy     Training      Products      Store       Subscribe       Sitemap       Contact Us

March 13, 2007

ISSN: 1538-3202

Issue: 381
Subscribers: 45,576

 More From Wrightslaw

Law Library
IDEA 2004

Section 504
Yellow Pages for Kids
No Child Left Behind

Training Schedule
March 23: Lansing, MI - From Emotions to Advocacy Training
March 24: Norfolk VA - Special Education Law & Advocacy Training
April 4: Wilmington, DE - What You Don't Know about NCLB and IDEA 2004 CAN Hurt You!
April 13-14: Nashua, NH - Two-Day Special Education Law and Advocacy Training
April 14: Knoxville/E Tenn - IDEA 2004 & NCLB: What You Don't Know CAN Hurt You!
 Contact Info

Pete and Pam Wright
Wrightslaw & The Special Ed Advocate
P. O. Box 1008
Deltaville, VA 23043



Copyright 2007, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved. Please do NOT reprint or host on your website without explicit permission.

At Wrightslaw, our mission is to help you gain the knowledge and skills you need to navigate the confusing, changing world of special education.


The Special Ed Advocate is the only weekly e-zine with up-to-date, accurate information about special education law and advocacy, cases, tactics and strategies. Published continuously since April 1998, subscribers receive alerts about new decisions, events, and special offers on Wrightslaw publications and products. Sign up free today!

In This Issue:
Can the IEP Team Prepare a "Draft IEP" Before an IEP Meeting?
IDEA 2004: Roadmap to the IEP
IDEA 2004 & IEP Resources
2006 Tax Benefits for Parents of Children with Disabilities
Poll Results: Winkelman v Parma
The Special Ed Advocate Do you know others who want to learn how to advocate for a child with a disability? Share this issue with them so they can learn about special education law and advocacy too. Newsletter Archives (1998-2007)

Can the IEP Team Prepare a "Draft IEP" Before an IEP Meeting?

When parents are presented with a "draft IEP," many assume that the school members of the IEP team do not value their concerns and input about their child.

IDEA 2004 discourages the use of "draft IEPs" because they send a message that parental concerns and parental participation are not valued.

In Can the IEP Team Prepare a Draft IEP?, Pat Howey describes the pros and cons of draft IEPs. She uses text from the Commentary to the IDEA 2004 regulations to support her position that the school must provide the parents with the draft IEP well in advance of the IEP meeting.

Parents and school personnel need to share important information before IEP meetings. Sharing information leads to healthier working relationships between parents and school personnel -- and better IEPs for the children.

Learn more about IEPs and how you can use the Commentary in Can the IEP Team Prepare a Draft IEP?

back to the top

IDEA 2004: Roadmap to the IEP
As we move into IEP season, you need to know how the requirements for IEPs changed in IDEA 2004.

What does the law say about developing, reviewing and revising IEPs? Who may be excused from IEP meetings, when, how?

When can the child's IEP be changed without an IEP meeting? What services must be provided when a child transfers to a district in the same state? A different state? What are the requirements for transition?

IDEA 2004: Roadmap to the IEP provides you with an overview of key changes in the law about IEPs.

back to the top

IDEA 2004 & IEP Resources

IDEA 2004: What You Need to Know About Functional Goals in IEPs

The IDEA 2004 statute and regulations include specific requirements about using present levels of functional performance to develop functional goals in the IEPs for all children with disabilities. Pat Howey teaches you how to find answers to your questions in references that are available on Wrightslaw.

IDEA 2004: What You Need to Know About IEPs for Children with Behavior Problems

IDEA 2004 and the special education regulations include specific requirements for IEPs of children whose behavior impedes their learning or the learning of other children, including training teachers to use positive behavioral interventions and strategies.

IDEA 2004: IEPs, Highly Qualified Teachers & Research Based Instruction

Learn about new language in IDEA 2004 that is designed to ensure that children with disabilities are taught by highly qualified teachers and receive research based instruction. This article includes new requirements for personnel training, IEPs, and scientifically based instruction.

IDEA 2004: What You Need to Know About IEP Team Members & IEP Team Attendance

Learn about IEP team members and IEP team attendance, when team members may be excused from a meeting, and what parents and the school district must do before a team member may be excused.

back to the top

2006 Tax Benefits for Parents of Children with Disabilities by Mike O'Connor, Esq.
If you have a child with a disability - a severe learning disability (SLD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), AD/HD, or other physical, mental or emotional impairment - you may qualify for valuable tax benefits.

According to parent attorney Mike O'Connor, "It's likely that 15-30 percent of families with a disabled child have one or more unclaimed tax benefits."

Did you know that "Special instruction or training or therapy, such as sign language instruction, speech therapy, and remedial reading instruction" may be deductible? Did you know that related books and materials can qualify for the medical expense deduction"?

In 2006 Tax Benefits for Parents of Children with Disabilities, Mr. O'Connor provides a summary of the most significant federal income tax benefits. He advises you to print this guide and provide your tax adviser with a copy. We agree with this excellent advice!

Download your copy of 2006 Tax Benefits for Parents of Children with
by Mike O'Connor, Esq.

back to the top

Poll Results: Winkelman v. Parma
After oral argument in Winkelman v. Parma, attorney Wayne Steedman wrote "Will the Supreme Court Side with the Parents in Winkelman v. Parma? Oral Argument Provides Clues."

Will the Court issue a favorable decision for the parents or the school? Will the decision be split or unanimous? You cast your vote about the outcome of this case. Here are the results of the Winkelman Parma poll:

Read the transcript of Oral Argument in Winkelman v. Parma.

back to the top

We are scheduling programs for 2007 and 2008. If you are interested in bringing a Wrightslaw program to your community, please read our Conference Information page.

What People Are Saying About The Special Ed Advocate Newsletter

"Thanks for the trustworthy information and support you provide through the Wrightslaw website and newsletter. You helped our family act when we needed to - we are thriving now."


Great Products From Wrightslaw

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright Wrightslaw: No Child Left Behind

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board

About the Book
To Order
About Book
To Order
About Book
To Order
About DVD Video
To Order