U. S. Supreme Court Issues 6-3 Decision in Arlington v. Murphy
Justice Alito, author of the majority decision, wrote,"We hold that it does not." Justice Breyer wrote the dissent and was joined by Justices Souter and Stevens.
"If parents have taken the appropriate steps, they will use evidence from the psycho-educational evaluation by the private sector expert to support their position that the school's educational program is not appropriate and needs to be changed."
"It is unlikely that parents will fail to take the necessary steps to prepare for litigation because they do not expect to recover fees for their 'expert witness.'"
Wrightslaw Note: Analysis of Arlington v. Murphy by Pete Wright may be photocopied and distributed.
What You Don't Know About IDEA 2004 & NCLB CAN Hurt You!
Are you confused about changes in IDEA 2004? Don't understand how children with disabilities are affected by No Child Left Behind? You aren't alone!
In response to your requests for IDEA 2004 training, we developed What You Don't Know About IDEA 2004 & NCLB CAN Hurt You!
IDEA 2004 & NCLB: What You Don't Know About IDEA 2004 & NCLB CAN Hurt You is a one-day, six hour Wrightslaw program that focuses on changes in IDEA 2004, the interrelationships between IDEA 2004 and No Child Left Behind, and how to use these laws to get better special education services for children with disabilities. Sample agenda
You will learn about:
Presenters are are Wayne Steedman, Esq. or Peter W. D. Wright, Esq.
Learn more about What You Don't Know About IDEA 2004 & NCLB CAN Hurt You!
Learn about other Wrightslaw Training Programs.
Check the schedule to see when we are coming to your area.
The Special Ed Advocate is a free online newsletter about special education legal and advocacy issues, cases, and tactics and strategies. Newsletter subscribers also receive "alerts" about new cases, events, and special offers on Wrightslaw books. Subscribe