Wrightslaw l No Child Left Behind l IDEA 2004 l Fetaweb l Yellow Pages for Kids l Harbor House Law Press
 Home > Advocacy Library  > FAQs> "What Does the Law Say About Grades and IEPs?"


The Special Ed Advocate
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

 

2014 - 2015 Training Programs

Oct 30 - Phoenix, AZ

Nov. 1 - Grand Rapids, MI

Nov 6 - McAllen, TX

Nov 18 - DesMoines, IA

Nov 21 - Temecula, CA

Dec 4 - OKC, OK

Full Schedule

Be a Hero ...

 Jason at Ft. Benning
... to a Hero
Learn more

Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Consultations
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Books & DVDs
Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Bulk Discounts
New! Military Discounts
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Summer School Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
IDEA 2004
No Child Left Behind
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504
Fed Court Complaints

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention (Part C)
Eligibility
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
ISEA
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE/Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
No Child Left Behind
NCLB Directories
NCLB Law & Regs
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based Instruction
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Restraints/Abuse
Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 

"What does the law say about grades for children with disabilities?"

Print this page

I am a special education teacher. Our director has told us that our students are not "allowed" to make any grades below a C (no Dís or Fís are allowed).

The director said if a child receives a grade below a C, this means the IEP isn't valid and we need to write a new IEP with a functional behavior assessment because the only reason a child should make grade below a C is because of behavior.

Can you please direct me to the law or anything in the law regarding this subject?

From Wrightslaw

Your director's advice about giving children passing grades could get him/her and the teachers into hot water. If special ed kids always get passing grades, it won't take a lawyer or an auditor to know that someone is cooking the books.

There is nothing in the statute about kids with disabilities receiving specific grades. However -

Appendix A

The federal special education regs were issued in March, 1999. Appendix A is part of these regulations. Appendix A is 40 Questions & Answers about IEPs, IEP meetings and IEP teams, the parent's role, children with disabilities being tested on state and districtwide testing, transition plans, etc.

(As a special education teacher, you should read Appendix A. It's in our new book, Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, and it's also on our website. I added links at the end of this letter. I'd advise you to download Appendix A, then print it.)

IEP goals describe what the child should accomplish during the school year (improved reading skills, writing skills, behavior, etc).

Appendix A says that the child's progress toward the goals must be assessed on a regular basis (and progress is NOT measured simply by grades!). If the child is not making sufficient progress toward the goals, the IEP team should meet and decide what additional services the child needs.

The law does not say that children should receive Cís. However. . .

Bd. Educ. v Amy Rowley (1982)

In 1982, the U. S. Supreme Court issued their first decision in a special education case in "Board of Education v. Amy Rowley ( 458 U. S. 176). Amy Rowley had a severe hearing impairment. She was also gifted. By first grade, most of her skills were at the 3rd and 4th grade level and her grades were excellent.

After wrestling with the concept of "free appropriate public education," the Court concluded that a "free appropriate public education" (FAPE) must confer "educational benefit." They found that Amy was making above average progress in the regular classroom. They found that when children are being educated in regular classrooms:

"the system itself monitors the educational progress of the child. Regular examinations are administered, grades are awarded, and yearly advancement to higher grade levels is permitted for those children who attain an adequate knowledge of the course material."

"Children who graduate from our public school systems are considered by our society to have been "educated" at least to the grade level they have completed, and access to an "education" for handicapped children is precisely what Congress sought to provide in the Act." (from Rowley decision in Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, page 311)

Since the Supreme Court issued the Rowley decision, school board attorneys have argued that if a child has "passing grades," this proves that the child is receiving an appropriate education. Your letter shows the error in this argumentĖteachers are being told to give passing grades to all children.

In Rowley, the Court added this footnote:

"We do not hold today that every handicapped child who is advancing from grade to grade in a regular public school system is automatically receiving a "free appropriate public education." (from Rowley decision in Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, page 317)

The fact that you were told to give your students "passing grades" (even when studentís donít earn passing grades) shows why parents (and hearing officers) must be careful about relying on "passing grades."

GRADE INFLATION

Parents should not rely on grades to determine their childís progress. The ERIC database contains an article entitled "What Do Student Grades Mean? Differences across Schools. Education Research Report."

"In spite of widespread concerns about low academic achievement nationally, parents generally have expressed satisfaction with their own children's achievement and schools, largely because their children's grades suggest that they are doing well."

"This report examines what student grades tell about achievement through the use of data from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88)."

"Overall, the average grade today is a ĎB.í Parents need to ask how grades are determined, and whether the student is receiving an appropriately challenging education."

This Reseach Report in on the U. S. Dept of Education site:

Bad Advice

From the mail we receive, itís clear that many special educators are getting bad advice from directors. Apparently, special ed directors are getting bad advice. The amount of misinformation in schools is mind-boggling.

In our opinion, implementing a practice of giving students "passing grades" when they donít earn passing grades is fraudulent. Such a practice will mislead parents by providing them with erroneous information and will deprive children of the specialized services they need.

Remedy for Bad Advice

There is a remedy for bad advice. You should read the law and regulations for yourself. Don't rely on what others tell you.

Maybe your director should order Wrightslaw: Special Education Law! We are pleased to report that many school districts are ordering the Special Education Law book for staff training.

Here is the link to the main page for the IDEA Regs

Here is the link for Appendix A

Thanks for taking the time to write.

Wrights


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!

 

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About IEPs
About the Book

Wrightslaw: All About Tests and Assessments
About the Book

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board
About the DVD Video

 

Copyright © 1998-2014, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Press Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map